Archive for June, 2010

Jobs, Jobs, Where For Art Thou

Friday, June 4th, 2010
Today's S&P 500 Chart

Today's S&P 500 Chart

All week we’ve been hearing about the big growth in jobs that would be reported today. Wednesday, President Obama even stated it in a speech. But, it was not to be. The economy only added 41,000 jobs in May – not the stuff economic recoveries are made of.

The news sent the S&P 500 down over 3% as I write this – just not a pretty day.

I caught a lot of heat from some of the readers of this blog when I made my 2010 Economic and Market Forecasts at year-end. I noted that I thought we’d more likely see 11% unemployment before we saw 8% unemployment, and that the Federal Reserve was unlikely to raise short-term interest rates until the unemployment rate got somewhere closer to 8%. There were a lot of people on the TV saying that unemployment had peaked and that we were going to see a return to much better employment levels due to the economic stimulus the government had enacted. At that time, I didn’t see where the jobs would come from and I still don’t as that stimulus package did not target economic growth but instead focused on easing the pain of the economic downturn through increased Medicaid and unemployment benefits – the Congressional Budget Office even noted that only 12% of the plan was aimed at any sort of economic growth.

The shock of today’s report in the face of all the calls by economists and the government that the number released today would be wildly positive and reflect a strong economic recovery seems to be more than investors can take. Thus, the sell off.

Many big companies are down more than the broader market. As I scan my lists of the stocks I follow, I see that Parker Hanifin is down 6%, Agilent Technologies is down 6%, Bank of Montreal is down 4.5%, Charles River Labs is down 5%, Emerson Electric down 5%, Foster Wheeler is down 8%, Met Life is down 7.5%, yet the oil spill culprits of BP and Transocean are down 1%. It’s a bizaro market today.

As we head into the last hour, the program trading routines will likely kick in and potentially could accelerate the downside or push us up. Who knows – things right now are not logical. In a situation like that, the best plan is to stick to your strategy (which we are) and watch the action.

We bought some Cenovus Energy today and some Kraft but that is about all. Cenovus is focused on Canadian oil production – far from the Gulf of Mexico – and was sold off with the producers of oil from the Gulf yet will not be negatively impacted by any moratorium on drilling – rather it should be positively impacted by the increase in the price of oil if supply from Gulf production is taken out of the world’s daily demand. Kraft with its nearly 4% yield and > 15% earnings growth fits our barbell strategy of cash flow and high earnings growth, two things that will be key outperforming the broader market as we fight our way through this secular bear market.

Click Here for \"Workin For A Livin\'\" Video

Enjoy your weekend and I’ll be back with more thoughts on the market.


Back From Vacation – Market Strategy Update

Tuesday, June 1st, 2010


Well I am back from vacation and wanted to touch base on the market and what we’ve been doing while I was out of town.

If you recall before I left I noted that we had raised a significant amount of cash into the rally from the January/February correction when the market was in the process of forming a topping pattern as shown by the blue box on the chart. We were looking to put that cash to work in the “Buy Zone” as shown by a purple box on the chart as that present good value for reinvestment purposes.

John and Charlie were hard at work implementing the strategy while I was out, and I am happy to report that in spite of the market being down around 8% in May, the purchases they implemented in the buy zone were up a net 0.80% as of today – naturally some were up and some were down from their buy price, but on an aggregated basis, the purchases have worked out pretty good.

That is the good news. The bad news is that as I look at the chart, I see we have had a change in character in this market. If you look at the mid-May timeframe on the chart, you will see that we were unable to break back above the 50-day moving average, which led to a failed rally and a drop back into the buy zone. We then moved below the 200-day moving average (a bad sign – you may want to review previous posts that discuss the importance of the 200-day moving average if you are curious about it) and have not been able to break above it, even on some fairly strong rally days. We now even have the 50-day moving average line curling down and looking like it wants to move to the 200-day line.

Given these issues in the character of the market (which provide observable clues to investor behavior based upon their otherwise non-quantifiable sentiments and feelings) we will continue to hold onto the balance of the cash that we raised to see if there will be another buying opportunity. That buying opportunity might consist of a lower Buy Zone than the current one, you just never know.

I had a couple of emails from readers that wanted to know if we were headed back to the crash lows of last March. I thought I’d share with you a couple of thoughts on that.

1. The crash was precipitated by a systemic problem with the world’s financial markets, particularly a freeze up on the credit market caused by the Lehman Brothers’ bankruptcy. Below I have posted a chart of the TED Spread which I’ve written about here before. Back in 1987, I learned that this chart is a consistently reliable indicator of systemic failures in the financial markets.


You can see that in May 2007, the chart started to get elevated. I wrote to you at that time that we were eliminating our exposure to the financial sector (eg, banks and brokerages) due to the systemic risks building in the system from the sub-prime mess. That proved to be a good decision as those mortgages ended up bringing down many former financial powerhouses. You can also see that as a forecasting tool, the TED Spread reliably told us ahead of the crash in September 2008 that there was something major wrong with the financial system.

Looking at today, though, we are in the historically normal range on this 5-year chart. Yes, it is above where it was in the past several months, but it is still in a normal range. We will continue to monitor it, obviously, but at this time it is not telling us that we have a systemic financial system issue that could lead us back to the crash lows.

2. The corporate fundamentals being reported (eg, earnings, earnings growth, improved corporate balance sheets and reduced debt to equity levels) along with valuations (ie, lowered P/E ratios due to the current correction) are so much better than they were at the crash lows. Things have changed since then and many of our favorite companies are in so much better shape than they were 15 months ago. That’s not to say their stock prices can’t go sown some, but the fundamentals show that any pullback would present a good investment value.

3. We are still in an easy money environment and we will likely stay that way until unemployment gets below 8%. If you look at a chart of the Fed’s M2 money supply data, you can see that money supply is still growing (M2 is a measure of the nation’s money supply and you can see that it grew dramatically during the official recession, but has trended up much more slowly since then as the Fed has reduced some of its more aggressive policy measures). As long as the money supply doesn’t contract, this will continue to provide support for stock prices.

So, for now, we are watching and analyzing. As things change, I’ll keep you up-to-date on our activities, but for those of you that may be concerned that we are headed back to the lows of 15 months ago, there is nothing currently out there to indicate that is the case. If something were to rear its head, we would act on it and advise you.

Hang in there and we need to let this correction run its course and pick up some quality companies when the opportunities present themselves.