This blog is intended to keep clients and friends current on my investment management activities. In no way is this intended to be investment advice that anyone reading this blog should act upon in their personal investment accounts. There are other significant factors involved in my investment management activities that may not be written about in this blog that are equally as important as the things that are written about that materially impact investment results. Neither is this blog to be construed in any way to be an offer to buy or sell securities. To be notified via e-mail when new posts are made, click on the subscribe button below. To view previous investment strategies, click strategy downloads.
Subscribe Here   Click here to view my Google+ page.

Yield Curve Ball

May 26th, 2016

Inverted Yield Curve 2000Double click on any image for a full sized view

One of the things that I find really troublesome is the Yield Curve, or more specifically, what the Federal Reserve will do to stimulate the economy when we get to the next recession and stock market correction.

The Yield Curve is a line graph that plots the span of interest rates from overnight rates to 30-year bond rates on a single day.  In a normal situation, short-term rates are lower than long-term rates and the line graph has an upward slope to it.  But there are times, in particular when you are at a recession, that short-term rates are higher than long-term rates – this is called an inverted yield curve.  This situation comes from investors fleeing the stock market due to the risk of corporate earnings falling in the recession. The investors are reinvesting their money in the safety of bonds, driving the longer term rates down since there is so much demand.  The inversion can also be aided by a Federal Reserve that doesn’t cut interest rates fast enough to avoid the recession.

In the graph above from the peak of the stock market in 2000 (the red vertical line) you can see the yield curve on that specific day (the red downward sloping line) was inverted.  The recession was upon us and the stock market started its long journey down as corporate earnings were less than expected.

Normal Yield Curve 2003Fast forward to the bottom of the stock market in 2003 (again the red vertical line) and you can see that the Federal Reserve had cut short-term interest rates from roughly 6% to 1% in order stimulate the economy.  The yield curve resumed its normal shape and companies started to experience increased earnings coming out of the recession, those earnings increases translated into a bull market for stocks.

Inverted Yield Curve 2007Fast forward to the top of the market in 2007 and you can see that we again have an inverted yield curve.  Shortly after this date, the recession takes hold and corporate earnings begin to fall sending the stock market down decisively (this was a lack-of-liquidity driven market crash as much as falling corporate earnings).  To combat the recession and to add liquidity to the financial system, the Federal Reserve cut interest rates again.

Normal Yield Curve 2009You can see that at the bottom of the market in 2009, we again have a normal yield curve with short-term rates cut by the Federal Reserve from just under 5% to just above 0%.  Those near 0% rates fueled a rally in the stock market that ran to last May’s highs.  Unfortunately, corporate earnings have started to fall again and there is talk of another recession coming our way.

Flattening Yield Curve 2016This is the yield curve today.  You can see that it is still a normal yield curve, but that it is noticeably flatter than the one above (this could possibly presage an inverted yield curve – but it would be difficult to get long-term rates near zero, but anything can happen in this economy where we have no past history to learn from).  You can also see that the Federal Reserve has kept short-term rates at the near 0% level.  The question we should all want an answer to is what will the Fed do when we get to the next recession if it cannot lower interest rates since they never raised them as would be normal during an economic cycle.

There is a lot of speculation that our Federal Reserve will follow the European Central Bank in two ways:  negative interest rates and purchasing corporate bonds in a new round of quantitative easing.

We haven’t talked about QE in a while here on the blog because the Fed ended that practice a couple years ago – QE is where the Federal Reserve prints money to flood the economy with liquidity by buying government bonds.

Both of these actions, if the Fed were to follow the ECB’s lead, would be unprecedented.  Much of the economic stagnation we currently have comes from the 0% rates – consumers and businesses have loaded up on debt to record levels given the low rates.

Consumers have incomes that have not kept up with their debt fueled spending and they are not the catalyst for economic activity that they once were.

Corporations have used the debt to buy back their outstanding shares of stock, a financial trick that makes their earnings per share appear to go up simply because there are fewer shares to spread the earnings over.  The side effect of borrowing to buy back shares is that reinvestment into property, plant and equipment as well as research and development has been curtailed, adding to our economic stagnation.

What unintended harm can negative rates or QE for corporate bonds have?  I don’t know but it will likely continue to provide the wrong incentives for consumers and corporations while not doing anything to stimulate the economy.  This is our yield curve curve ball, or with a nod to Wheel of Fortune, our yield curve ball.

A Return to Volatility or Not?

May 10th, 2016

S&P 500 Index 20-yearsDouble click any image for a full sized view

There was a recent report from one of the Wall Street banks saying that the current volatility in the markets is a new phenomenon and that for the balance of the year investors should expect to experience more of it.

I’ll take the under on the first part of that statement.

Over the past 20 years, we have had similar volatility until just recently, so in effect the current bit of volatility is really a return to normal market action.  If you look at the graph above  you can see that the current volatility in the market started in the summer of last year, after roughly three years of calm upward movement in the market.  Prior to the fall of 2012, the graph shows similar volatility during its bigger secular bull and bear moves back to 1996.

As for the balance of the year, I agree that the markets will continue with the current level of volatility, albeit in a downward direction.  In the two most recent blog posts that I wrote, I discuss this very thing.  To summarize those posts, the intermediate to long term direction of the market is down and investors need to have a defensive asset mix including a healthy allocation to cash so that when there are short-term movements up or down within the major trend, they can use it for trading purposes.

If investors are not comfortable with trading for short-term gains, then buying a bond fund has historically acted as a hedge against major market crashes.  Here are a couple of graphs depicting how stocks and bonds trade in near mirror image, this first one shows the Dot Com boom and bust:

S&P V Bonds - NASDAQ Crash

and this second one shows the Subprime Mortgage crash:

S&P V Bonds - Subprime Crash

The downside with the bond fund is that if the Fed really gets into interest rate hiking mode, the bond funds will go down in value commensurate with the size of the rate hikes and the duration of the fund.

However, if the market crashes (and it is always possible given the risks to the financial markets that are out there) then a high quality US Treasury fund will be the best investment imaginable.   Since US economic activity is pretty tepid, there is little chance of significant rate increases in the near future, so booking profits in your stock portfolio (or stock mutual funds) and buying a high quality US Treasury Fund plays the percentages pretty well.

Why do I mention crashes?  Well, a lot of smart investors are already talking about it.  One is Carl Icahn whose hedge fund is 150% net short.  He is on record of stating that the market has a greater change of going down 20% than going up 20%.  Carl may or may not be right, but having some protection for your portfolio and structuring it in a defensive manner when the market is near an all-time high with falling earnings and poor technicals seems to be the prudent thing at the present time instead of swimming against the tide.

Price Momentum Guidance

May 9th, 2016

PMODouble click on any image for a full sized view

After Thursday’s post on the Fair Value of the S&P 500 along with a technical analysis demonstrating investor sentiment, I received a couple of emails from readers who wanted to know a bit more about the technical aspects of what I follow to help determine market direction.

For a big picture intermediate-long term view of where we are headed, I use a 20-year monthly price chart and compare it to the Price Momentum Oscillator (PMO).  I know sounds like Sanskrit for some folks so let me explain.

The price graph (the top panel of the image) above is based upon the monthly movement of the S&P 500 compared to the 10-month moving average of the index.  You can see that the red/black line moves above and below the moving average, indicating bull Vs bear markets.

You can also see a bunch of red circles which I’ll explain in a bit.  For now, though, look at the one on the price graph far to the right.  You can see that the market is moving up and down across the moving average.  To me, this says the market is in a topping process – investors no longer have the conviction to keep pushing it higher but there are still some dip buyers out there that will jump in if it falls to a certain level.

Those red circles are pretty important when you compare them to the PMO.   The PMO is an indicator of the strength of price movement within the market.  Instead of a visual analysis of the index itself, this indicator measure the activity in the market and tells you if investors are acting bullishly or bearishly.

When we look at the PMO on a long-term chart like the one above, you can see in the red circles points in time when the blue line crosses over the red indicator line.  Those crosses are critical as they demonstrate that investors’ are acting in either bullish or bearish manner and that the direction of the market is taking a change.

So for now, we are being cautious and defensive is critical as a strategy but being nimble and putting cash to work on a short term tactical basis when the market gets short-term oversold.  Then when it gets short-term overbought (there are other indicators that I use for short-term market movements that I’ve highlighted here on the blog previously), we are raising cash again to get back to a defensive position.

Our typical practice is to utilize  index exchange traded funds (ETF’s) for this short-term tactical investment activity.  I’m actually pretty grateful that ETF’s have come to such prominence in the past few years given their liquidity and ease of trading, making this a much more efficient and effective process.  As an example, when market was at the February lows, we purchased shares of the Russell 2000 ETF then as the market became short-term over-bought we sold it for a 5% gain after three weeks or so and reinvested the proceeds back into a cash equivalent until the market gets back to short-term over-sold.  Wash, Rinse, Repeat :)

As I write this, the market is hovering around break-even with little volume – another sign of the indecision among investors.  When there is indecision, the best thing to do is sit back and watch for signs that a sustainable move will develop in one direction or the other.   Unfortunately, given the reading of the PMO, breaking out to new highs is unlikely so our defensive strategy is the best choice for now.

S&P 500 Fair Value

May 5th, 2016

S&P valuationDouble click on any image for a full sized view

With the market appearing to rollover and head lower, I thought it would be informative to take a look at our S&P 500 Fair Value calculation again.  Its been a while since I’ve written about it, but with the annual “sell in May and go away” slogan being bantered about in the financial news and opinion articles/interviews now seems a good time to determine if the market is overvalued or undervalued at current levels.

As a refresher for long time readers of the blog, the calculation above takes four different metrics of the market based upon the historical mean valuation levels and computes a current value for the market using current data.

1.  Historic Mean P/E Ratio X Projected 2016 Earnings Estimates

  • Valuing the market based upon the underlying earnings of the companies computes a value based upon the returns that investors should expect to receive.  Our calculation shows that the value of the S&P 500 under this metric is 1800 compared to our current value of 2058  [Market is Overvalued]

2.  Historic Mean Shiller P/E Ratio X Projected 2016 Earnings Estimates

  • This metric uses the same calculation above except it substitutes the Shiller P/E for traditional P/E.  The Shiller P/E is calculated as a rolling 10-year average of the traditional P/E Ratio.  The idea is to smooth out the volatility of any one year for a more representative valuation.  Our calculation shows that the value of the S&P 500 under this metric is 1925 compared to our current value of 2058  [Market is Overvalued]

3.  Historic Mean Price to Book Value X Current Book Value

  • Price to Book Value is different from Price to Earnings in that P/E values the market by its earnings potential and P/B values it by the collective value of the assets of the companies in the market.  Our calculation shows that the value of the S&P 500 under this metric is 2028 compared to our current value of 2058  [Market is Fairly Valued]

4.  Historic Mean Price to Sales Ratio X Current Sales

  • Price to Sales is different from either P/E or P/B in that P/S values a company according to its operational efficiency in generating revenue.  Our calculation shows that the value of the S&P 500 under this metric is 1600 compared to our current value of 2058  [Market is Significantly Overvalued]

 The Final Step

  • To come up with an overall value, I use a weighted average of the above four calculations.  To me, the two most important valuations are the Shiller P/E value and the P/S value because I prefer to have the smoothed earnings valuation that minimizes volatility and I prefer to look at a company’s ability to generate revenue over the value of its assets which by its very nature is a liquidation value for a company and not an ongoing business.
  • Using the weighted average calculation on the chart above, you can see we come up with a Fair Value of 1823 for the S&P 500, or roughly 11% below the current value.

So how do we use this?  I like to take a graphic look at the market to see what technical levels based upon investor sentiment tell us:

S&P 500 2016-05-05This graph tells me a lot about the market that supports the fair value calculation.

First, if you look at the horizontal line I’ve drawn at the bottom of the graph, it shows you where the market fell to on the February correction.  That line corresponds fairly closely with our current Fair Value calculation.  We should view that as a major support level for the market for two reasons:

  • (1) its the prior correction low and it coincides with our fair value – this is the obvious one, and
  • (2) if you look at the far left side of the graph you will see some red and green bars; these represent the volume of buyers and sellers at the various price levels; down at the 1823-ish level on the index you see a small red bar which indicates that level has primarily seen selling but not a lot of it which tells me most investors view that level as one to hold onto their investments because they are not being paid to sell and there is not any panic feeling about the market falling to that level.

In just the opposite reading, look at the second bar from the top.  You see it is much larger than the bottom bar meaning there was a lot of trading volume at that level (which currently corresponds with the price level we are at now) and the bar is pretty closely split between green and red (with green slightly larger if you look really closely).  This tells me that investors have no conviction at that price level for the index, the buyers will be likely sellers if the market doesn’t move up and the sellers will likely be buyers if it does.

So since the market has rolled over, the former buyers will on whole want to lock in the current price before the market goes down more, adding to downward pressure.  Then as the selling gathers momentum, it should slow at the next level lower since there were fewer historic buyers.  Interestingly enough, that level provides some additional technical support as both the 50-day moving average and the 200-day moving average are right there.

The market has the opportunity to turn higher at that level, between 2043 and 2013, however if it doesn’t, it will then likely head toward our 1823-ish horizontal support line.  There will be other lesser support levels below 2013 and above 1823 which we can discuss if the market heads that way. However, you see the diminishing volume on the way down is predominantly green which means there are former buyers that will want to lock in their profits so they down show a loss, which will add to downward pressure on the index.

For now, though, my view is pretty bearish overall and view the market as headed lower.  It is VERY significant that (1) corporate sales and earnings continue to fall putting more downward pressure on our Fair Value and (2) the market has been unable to break above the all time high set last May and from a technical standpoint it looks like in the near-term the market is headed lower and will not make an assault on that peak anytime soon.

Because of this, we have an overweight of cash and bonds in client portfolios in order to (1) protect their capital and (2) to give us ammunition to pull the trigger on buying some of our favorite companies at lower values.

As things progress, check back here or you can subscribe by clicking the link above and get an automated shout out via email when a new post is made.


Manufacturing Recession?

April 22nd, 2016

Markit ManufacturingBy this point, most readers of this blog know that I am in a very defensive posture relative to portfolio construction.  We are holding money markets and fixed income in an effort to have some dry powder available to buy our favored holdings when we get a correction.  I thought we would have had it by now given that corporate earnings are down 8% year-over-year and that valuations for the stock market are at their highest level since the last recession.

Fundamentally, stocks are over-valued and the US economy is slowing appreciably.  US GDP growth was 0.3% in the first quarter of the year according to the Atlanta Federal Reserve Bank.

Today, the Manufacturing PMI was released which shows the US manufacturing sector headed to recessionary levels not seen in several years.  Chris Williamson, chief economist at Markit said:

“US factories reported their worst month for just over six-and-a-half years in April,      dashing hopes that first quarter weakness will prove temporary.

     “Survey measures of output and order book backlogs are down to their lowest since the height of the global financial crisis, prompting employers to cut back on their hiring.

“The survey data are broadly consistent with manufacturing output falling at an annualized rate of over 2% at the start of the second quarter, and factory employment dropping at a rate of 10,000 jobs per month.

You can see in the graph above from Markit that manufacturing activity is just about to head into recession.

Below is a graph of manufacturing employment from Markit:

Markit EmploymentYou can see that this is seriously impacting employment in the manufacturing sector as well.

The stock market has been going up in spite of the fundamentals deteriorating.  However, even though it has tried multiple times to break out to new highs, it just has not been able to do it.  Check out the graph below:

S&P 500 2016.l04.22Over the past year, the market has dropped, recovered, then dropped again. The general pattern is for the market to fall, recover but not as strongly as before, then to fall again even further, recover but not as strongly – wash, rinse, repeat.

You can see that the market looks like it has rolled over but we need to see some follow-through before we determine if we’ve entered a correction or not.

From a technical standpoint, we are in a bear market correction until it can break above the horizontal blue line and start a new leg higher.  I have trouble believing it can continue higher in the face of falling earnings and a slowing economy – but given that the computers are now making most of the trades based upon momentum strategies, the index will go further in each direction than makes sense before it switches and moves in the opposite direction.

Happy Earth Day!


Lower Highs and Lower Lows

April 12th, 2016

SPX 2016-04Its been a few weeks since the last post on the blog – the market has meandered up and down and we are just now seeing the pattern that is developing.

In the graph above, you can see the formation of a series of lower highs and lower lows with investors unable to move the market to a new high.

From a technical standpoint, this is not a good sign for the market.  But lets take a step back and remember what chart reading is really all about.  The charts are just graphic representations of investor behavior and sentiment.  This chart shows that there was positive sentiment that lead to a new high almost a year ago.  Since then, investors have been in a tug of war with part of them in a glass half full mood and part of them in a glass half empty mood.

The glass half empty crowd:  (1) sees a stock market that is overvalued at 25 times earnings, (2) sees corporate earnings that have steadily been falling over the past year and a half,  (3) sees a slowing economy with the manufacturing sector already in recession and the service sector bouncing on either side of zero growth, (4) see a Federal Reserve that is in a rate increase mode, even if that mode is projected to be slower than originally forecast, and (5) believes we are headed into a recession later in the year.    Their view is that the market needs to correct so that valuation comes in line with these headwinds.

The glass half full crowd:  (1) sees the US economy being stronger than any of our trading partners, (2) sees a potential for strengthening of the Chinese economy, (3) believes that the steps taken in Europe to stimulate its economy should begin to produce dividends, (4) sees the dollar weaken against foreign currencies, which should be a positive for corporate earnings, and (5) sees a Federal Reserve that is putting the brakes on rate increases.  Their view is that the market can push to new highs.

When you look at the graph, you can see that the investment crowd with a negative view is winning this battle.  They have been able to drive prices down, then those with the positive view jump in to buy the dip.  Unfortunately for them, they do not have enough strength or conviction to drive prices higher.  You then have another selloff to a lower level before the dip buyers jump back in but lose steam before moving to a higher point.

Given the forecast for falling earnings and the current valuation at 25 times earnings compared to the historic average of 15 times earnings, caution is warranted.

Based upon this, we have adopted a conservative strategy in our portfolio management.  There is a time to be aggressive and a time to be conservative, and given the fundamental landscape for earnings and the slowing economy now is a time to be conservative.


2016 Strategy Update

January 11th, 2016

Sectors 2015-12Double click on any image for a full sized view

We have been very busy in recent weeks repositioning client accounts for what we see as a difficult year in the stock market in 2016.  With the Federal Reserve embarking on an interest rate tightening cycle, the dollar continuing to strengthen and regulatory compliance costs increasing, all resulting in corporate earnings continuing their slide, all happening at a time when stock price valuations are pushing historic highs and global economic activity is slowing, a more conservative posture to portfolio management is the focus of our 2016 strategy.

Toward that end, we are focusing our efforts on moving our overall asset allocation within each investment objective to its minimum level of equity allocation and maximum level of fixed income and cash equivalents.   That means, if a client investment objective is 65% Equity / 35% Fixed Income / 0% Cash Equivalents, it will move to 53.50% Equity / 41.5% Fixed Income / 5% Cash Equivalents.  The change is formula driven, but in essence, the equity exposure is reduced by a flat 5% (which is moved to cash equivalents) plus 10% of the original equity exposure (or 6.5% in this example) is moved into fixed income.

Within the equity allocation, we have increased our exposure to companies that will benefit from increasing interest rates – like banks, brokerages, life insurance, and payroll processing companies, all of which traditionally experience increased earnings due to higher levels of interest income – and more defensive holdings like consumer staples and utilities.

We have also been selling holdings that have higher than average leverage on their balance sheets since higher interest rates will increase their expenses and lower their net income.

In a typical interest rate increase cycle, you would avoid longer term fixed income and utilities investments as the entire rate curve shifts higher, not just the short term rates that the Federal Reserve dictates.  However, I believe this time, given the low level of economic activity we have been experiencing and the fact that we have the potential for a recession later in 2016 or early 2017, we will see longer term interest rates hold steady or even fall.  This scenario is very positive for fixed income and utilities investments, and it has in fact been playing out in this manner over since the Federal Reserve increased rates in mid-December.

On the bar graph above, I have charted the price performance of the various economic sectors of the stock market.  You can see that consumer staples and utilities stocks have far outperformed the rest of the market since the Federal Reserve increased rates in mid-December.  The odd thing is that financial stocks have under-performed, but when quarterly earnings are reported in April and the positive impact of the rate increase is shown in their bottom line numbers, that situation should reverse itself.

We have been incrementally making changes to implement this strategy over the past few weeks, but will implement this strategy in full during our semi-annual account rebalancing process this month.

Given the outlook for a potential recession later this year or early 2017 (just so you know, I am not being a rebel on this issue, Citigroup has already issued a report predicting one and various other economist have started to incorporate this scenario in their forecasts) I will be monitoring economic conditions closely.  As the economy continues to deteriorate, I will take the appropriate actions to protect client portfolios.

In order to monitor the probability of a recession, one tool I use is the St. Louis Fed’s own Smoothed Recession Probabilities indicator (see below):

Smoothed Recession ProbCurrently, the reading is flat, indicating a recession is not imminent.  However, that can change fairly rapidly and our response will be to act to protect client portfolios.

Another indicator we follow fairly closely is the TED spread.  This represents the yield differential between treasury bills and eurodollar deposits (or the yield spread between a risk free asset and one with short term risk).  When that line of the graph below gets elevated, that is an indication that there is some amount of stress in the financial system (see below):

TEDYou can see that the line has started to rise, but is no where near to the level it reached before and during the 2008 crash.  To me, this is just a sign that caution is called for at the current time.

Sam Zell, a man who has rightly attained billionaire investor fame, recently was on
Bloomberg TV stating that the US economy could go into a recession in the next year.  Zell has been putting his money where is mouth is, selling significant real estate holdings to raise cash.  He adopted this same stance prior to the 2008 market crash, selling a significant amount of his holdings at the top of the market.  He was then able to take advantage of rock bottom prices after the crash, being a buyer with cash when everyone else needed to be a seller to pay down their debt.

When we look at the various indicators of economic activity, many are under pressure and already in recession territory:

(1)  Construction spending was down 0.4% in November;

(2)  Energy, Mining and Commodities have been contracting for a couple of years, with layoffs and bankruptcies hitting the weakest of companies in those industries;

(3)  Manufacturing is contracting, with the ISM Survey reading 48.2 (below 50 is recessionary) and the Markit Manufacturing Purchasing Managers Index also giving a similar reading; and

(4) The services sector, the largest part of our economy, remains in growth territory but has dropped to a 55.3 reading in the ISM Survey – the weakness in other areas of the economy will continue to negatively impact the services sector until we are in a fully recognized economic recession.

We hear a lot about how unemployment is at low levels.  The indicator is in deed reading a low level of unemployment, but there are so many people, particularly young Americans, older workers, and others who are not counted in this because they have dropped out of the pool of people looking for work.  The indicator for this is at levels not seen since the 1970’s and continues to fall.  For an economy to be healthy and growing, we need both indicators to show healthy readings not just one or the other.

2016 will be a year of challenges in the economy and the stock market, its not a year to act like heroes with wildly aggressive allocations, but rather a focus on conservative investments that will allow us to weather the storm.  We recognize this and have already taken action to protect client accounts from what we see on the horizon.  If there are changes to the current situation and economic times get worse, we will act to protect client funds in the most prudent manner possible.

Best wishes for a happy and productive 2016 – and allow me to worry about the investment markets on your behalf!

RIP:  The many faces of David Bowie…




More Downside Ahead?

November 10th, 2015

spx-pmoDouble click on any image for a full sized view

The graph above is one that I follow fairly closely (and have for years) to give me a feel for the direction of the stock market as represented by the S&P 500 Index.  This is a graph that I last showed you this summer when I explained why we had raised cash in client accounts.

This monthly graph of the S&P 500 shows me the prevailing trend in index and its strength.  The indicator in the bottom pane is the Price Momentum Oscillator.  This indicator shows us how much momentum is behind the current trend, and the direction the trend is headed.

You can see that I’ve circled a few different points on the oscillator and on the price graph above it.  These represent longer term trend changes in the index.  You can see that in late 2009, after the crash had bottomed, the indicator turned positive and stayed that way for several years as the market recovered and moved to new highs.

Earlier this year, the indicator turned negative which is one of those flashing red lights for me as a portfolio manager.  The market in turn moved sideways for several months while we raised cash in client accounts.  In August and September, the market corrected >12%, but during October it moved back toward its old highs.

Unfortunately, the indicator continues to point to a weak stock market with potentially lower prices.  I say potentially because no indicator is 100% fool-proof.  This one has proven very reliable over the years and allowed us to take action ahead of major downturns and allowed us to get aggressive ahead of major bull market moves.

I’ve written before, but it seems like a good time to repeat it, that all charts are just representations of investor psychology.  If I look at this chart along with breadth statistics (like less than 1/2 the companies in the index are trading above their 200-day moving average – or in simple terms – less than 1/2 the companies in the index are in a bull market stage), I think this is telling us that investor psychology is weakening.  It may be because most now believe the Federal Reserve will raise interest rates in December or it may be some other less apparent reason – who knows.

As long as this red flag is out there, I plan to be cautious until a clear path to higher prices presents itself.  Just as we did with the August/September correction, we will be opportunistic with any sell offs and add to positions; conversely, as we have been doing over the past week or so, when the market moves back toward old highs, we will lock in the gains and raise cash.

Risk management is a key component to investment management and having the right tools in place to effectively execute your strategy maximizes performance.  Being conservative when risks are high and aggressive when risks are low are key to beating the indices.

Today’s video has no tie in to the blog post other than I was in the third row of the REO  Speedwagon concert last night:


So I thought I’d share one of my favorite songs that was written not too far from where I am sitting writing this post.   Enjoy!